English Literature The elegy usually has a story, not all too often a personal the one which expresses the implied writers woeful mind-set.
Oleanna has been widely acclaimed for its treatment of issues in American society of the s, such as gender problems and relationships, sexual harassment, political correctness, and the manipulation of power.
Oleanna is the good account of bizarre nature of play by David Mamet and its importance in the history of drama arises from its role as a model of a new kind of drama in which produce controversary for which the playwright has no solution and is extraordinary since the proposed solution for its controversary depends upon the audiences' and readers' response.
Mamet is significant because his postmodern minimalism leaves so much interpretation open to the viewer and different perception of the same event in Oleanna through different perspectives. Oleanna lends itself easily to gender, national identity as well as hidden language. This essay tries to show minimalism in stage and language as well as reversal power in characters of Oleanna; John and Carol.
Carol's opening line" what is a term of art? It reflects the postmodern view that the words do not precise meaning in the outer world, but rather are dependent on context for meaning. Technically, as John explained it, a term of art is a legal concept: In Oleanna, Mamet intentionally uses a number of dialogic devices which reflect varying levels of difficulty through which the problem of impaired communication can be easily traced and diagnosed.
Among these devices, the multiple phone calls are significant in the sense that they frequently interrupt the conversation and divert both characters in ways that inevitably distort and hinder clear perception and mutual understanding.
From the start, both characters experience difficulty understanding one another, partly due to the difference in language competency between professor and student. Normally, the discourse of university people, especially on campus, is distinguished by a set of constraints and values imposed by academic traditions.
John's cynical answer and the subsequent repartee illustrate how the dialogue fails to achieve verbal or non-verbal communication. It is not only because of the differences in their linguistic competence, but also because of their manner and mood during the discourse.
Because they are irritated and uncertain, they parry and reflect their confusion and mutual mistrust: John answers Carol's question reluctantly, while trying to simplify the diction and clarify the meaning: Pause Don't you think? When you have some 'thing. Pause Don't you think. Ironically, John's reply adds more mysticism rather than removing it.
Moreover, by doing this he leads Carol to develop an implicitly aggressive tone: In fact, John is devoid of the emotional and intellectual faculties that his status as an instructor requires. Instead, he is very proud of himself, his theories, his affairs, and his career, which he rates above everything.
Conceited as he is, John does not properly communicate with the out-of campus world. His frequent assertion that he "can't talk now" and that he will "call later" makes it clear that things are still hazy and undetermined. John is also disconnected by his isolation in the office space with only Carol whom he sees but fails to understand.
However, the only chance for better communication between John and Carol appears immediately before the end of act 1 when Carol starts to open a new channel and tell him about something that she has "never told anyone".
But, as usual, this is aborted by the fifth phone call after which he shifts abruptly to his tenure "surprise". In addition to the numerous pauses John makes in his unconvincing explanations, he fails to communicate properly with Carol because of his pretentious terminology: When he tells her that a "paradigm" is simply "a model," she reluctantly asks:The book has a clear-cut moral composition, whereby the nice characters are clearly distinguishable from the bad people and on the whole, good things happen to .
At my work, I usually practice my power through the use of language because it can be used as a perfect instrument for practicing a power over others. For example, my pose exercises his power over me and I exercise my power over other employers who are under my authority. Mamet constructs Oleanna as a play that explores the transition of power.
The initially frail character of Carol acts as a foil to John’s authoritative, and often at times demeaning, professor. Mamet unravels the intricacies of this student-teacher relationship through a three-act composition. research paper history of computers The Presentation Of Power In Oleanna how do i become a better essay writer phd thesis portal.
Oleanna lends itself easily to gender, national identity as well as hidden language. This essay tries to show minimalism in stage and language as well as reversal power in .
Language And Reversal Power In Oleanna Essay add: , / Views: Since its debut in May , David Mamets Oleanna, has become one of his most famous and controversial plays and achieved infamous in the wake of its initial production both in US and Britain; it has been the object of more widespread public rage, debate, and.